Featured case study

Office of Local Defense
Community Cooperation

Redesigning a critical government platform to enhance accessibility, streamline community engagement, and improve information discoverability for defense-related local initiatives. Research across internal staff, external applicants, and community partners mapped where the grant process breaks down — and what to do about it.

Steepest drop-off occurs at EADS submission

Role

UX Design
UX Research
Rebranding

Client

OLDCC

Programs

Miro
Figma
Confluence

Duration

6+ months

UX UI Accessibility
Case Study · OLDCC

Making federal grants findable.

The Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation funds community projects near military installations — but applicants couldn't tell whether they qualified, and planners didn't know OLDCC existed. Research across internal staff, external applicants, and community partners mapped where the process breaks down.

3
Personas
3
Research themes
19
Recommendations
3
Journey stages
Part 01

Who we're designing for

Three stakeholder groups move through the grants ecosystem with different goals, technical comfort, and urgency. Designing for the applicant alone would have failed the other two.

Hover any attribute to compare it across all three personas

Persona 01

Grant Applicant

Individual or organization seeking funding for community development projects

Primary goal

Secure funding quickly with clear application guidance

Tech proficiency

Moderate — comfortable with online forms and documentation

Time constraint

High urgency — needs fast information access and submission

Accessibility needs

Screen reader support, keyboard navigation, high contrast

Persona 02

Grant Reviewer

Committee member evaluating applications and making funding decisions

Primary goal

Efficiently review multiple applications against clear criteria

Tech proficiency

High — experienced with evaluation platforms and databases

Time constraint

Moderate — balances review quality with deadline pressure

Accessibility needs

Sortable tables, filter options, printable summaries

Persona 03

Community Member

Local resident interested in understanding grant impact and opportunities

Primary goal

Learn about funded projects and available opportunities

Tech proficiency

Low to moderate — basic browsing and reading

Time constraint

Low urgency — casual browsing and information gathering

Accessibility needs

Large text, plain language, mobile-friendly design

Part 02

What they told us

Stakeholder interviews surfaced three themes. Open one to see what users said and the specific changes recommended to fix it.

Internal Users

Usability finding
  • Want easier access to information about projects — what they are and how they get funded
  • Search process is difficult to use and hard to find information in
  • Most have some familiarity with OLDCC but limited detail about what it actually does

External Users

Usability finding
  • Searching for requirements and the process for applying eligibility
  • Small businesses interested in partnerships need clearer pathways
  • Communities need access to additional resources (FEMA, CISA, DHS)
  • Federal agencies want to learn how to leverage the programs
  • Opportunity to connect with other DOD programs OLDCC works with

Recommended solutions

6 recommendations
01
Homepage visual program overview

Small visuals with brief descriptions of each program, with expandable sections.

02
"Do you qualify?" section

Prominent qualification entry point on the homepage with clear criteria.

03
Step-by-step application process

Clear instructions with a "more details" expansion for depth.

04
Enhanced mission statement

Rewrite to explain what the organization actually does.

05
Improved readability

More white space, less texture, easier content consumption.

06
Eligibility requirements list

Detailed criteria distinguishing qualified from unqualified applicants.

Internal & External Users

Usability finding
  • Information about projects is difficult to find
  • Website is not engaging and could benefit from animation and graphics
  • Images and photos are old or not relevant and should be updated
  • Project locations are difficult to find

Recommended solutions

9 recommendations
01
Infographics for storytelling

Display relevant information as visual narrative rather than prose.

02
OLDCC history timeline

An "Our Journey" timeline showcasing organizational history.

03
Homepage banner announcements

Continue using the homepage banner for timely announcements.

04
Project catalog experience

An engaging, browsable catalog of community projects.

05
Reduce text-heavy pages

More imagery and infographics across the site.

06
High-quality project photography

Showcase real photography from funded projects.

07
Restore project pages

Most search clicks originate from them — bring them back.

08
Case studies & data pages

Community-focused case studies with impact metrics.

09
30-second explainer video

Short video explaining site content and navigation.

Community Planners & Partners

Usability finding
  • Community planners don't know who OLDCC is or what they do
  • Want an easy-to-read excerpt they can send as a link
  • Confusion persists between qualified and unqualified end users

Recommended solutions

4 recommendations
01
Clear application instructions

Documentation covering eligibility and the full application process.

02
Uniform page heading

A consistent heading style for recognition across the site.

03
Flexible eligibility submission

Allow flexibility in how final eligibility details are provided.

04
Distinct program pages

Make each program visually distinct while holding one brand.

Part 03

Where it breaks down

The applicant path from first awareness to submission. Confidence rises during research, then drops sharply once the EADS portal enters the picture.

Confidence across the journey Hover a point to highlight its stage
Stage 01 · Discovering
Curious, unsure, hopeful
Stage 02 · Researching
Cautiously optimistic, overwhelmed
Stage 03 · Applying
Anxious, diligent, high-stakes
Stage 01

Discovering Opportunities

Determine if OLDCC is relevant for their organization

Curious · Unsure · Hopeful
Actions
  • Browse the OLDCC website
  • Review active grant programs
  • Scan structural eligibility criteria
  • Unclear eligibility parameters
  • Dense federal jargon
  • Hard to quickly assess programmatic fit
  • Define who we fund vs. don't fund upfront
  • Concise, human-readable program overviews
Stage 02

Researching Grants

Confirm eligibility and specific project fit

Cautiously optimistic · Overwhelmed
Actions
  • Read detailed eligibility documentation
  • Review past successful case studies
  • Search for direct program contacts
  • Highly complex submission requirements
  • Information-dense documentation layers
  • Lack of concrete historical examples
  • Plain-English summaries alongside policy files
  • Showcase past grantee case studies
  • Direct contact cards embedded on pages
Stage 03

Applying for Grant

Submit a complete, accurate, compliant application

Anxious · Diligent · High-stakes
Actions
  • Register an account on the EADS portal
  • Gather organizational documentation
  • Complete mandatory digital forms
  • Heavy technical friction in the EADS platform
  • Pervasive fear of a disqualifying mistake
  • Vague post-submission next steps
  • Interactive step-by-step EADS wizard
  • Localized EADS video walkthroughs
  • Clear milestone confirmation emails

What success looks like at each stage

Stage 01 success

Continues exploring the site

Visitor spends meaningful time on resource pages and downloads program guidelines rather than bouncing immediately.

Stage 02 success

Decides to apply for a grant

Candidate initiates EADS portal registration and accesses the mandatory application worksheets.

Stage 03 success

Application submitted cleanly

A complete, error-free package filed through EADS on the first attempt with all supporting assets.

Next
Next

PHX